Volume 1, Issue 3, September 2015, Page: 35-37
Comparison of Sonography and MRI in Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Injuries
Sied Kazem Razavi Ratki, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Masoud Nakhaie-Nejad, Faculty of Pharmacy, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Nasim Namiranian, Yazd Diabetes Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Hamid reza Shafai Arani, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Mona Ghasemian, Faculty of Pharmacy, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Reza Nafisi-Moghadam, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Received: Jul. 15, 2015;       Accepted: Jul. 24, 2015;       Published: Jul. 28, 2015
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijcems.20150103.11      View  3544      Downloads  71
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Rotator cuff injuries are problems commonly encountered in athletic and non-athletic patients. Its definite diagnosis is also important. Accordingly, this study was performed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultra-sonography (US) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cases with suspicion of rotator cuff injuries. Methods and materials: In this prospective comparative study, 130 patients who had undergone shoulder arthroscopy and open rotator cuff repairing and confirm rotator cuff tears have been enrolled and evaluated with both ultrasonography and MRI methods. Results: The overall sensitivity (95% confidence interval[CI]) of US was 87.64% (78.55-93.37), the specificity (95%CI) was 89.02% (61.24-95.45). The overall sensitivity (95% confidence interval) of MRI was 91.31% (75.47-94.4) and the specificity (95%CI) of MRI was 83.02% (61.23-91.45). There was no statistical significance between sensitivity of two methods (p-value: 0.092). Conclusions: Totally, according to our findings and comparison with other similar studies, it could be concluded that ultrasonography has a good diagnostic modality in patients suspicious to rotator cuff tearing compared with MRI as a more diagnostic imaging test. Accordingly, its use is recommended in patients suspicious to have rotator cuff tearing
Keywords
Rotator Cuff Tearing, Ultrasonography, MRI
To cite this article
Sied Kazem Razavi Ratki, Masoud Nakhaie-Nejad, Nasim Namiranian, Hamid reza Shafai Arani, Mona Ghasemian, Reza Nafisi-Moghadam, Comparison of Sonography and MRI in Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Injuries, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences. Vol. 1, No. 3, 2015, pp. 35-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcems.20150103.11
Reference
[1]
Dalton S. The conservative management of rotator cuff disorders. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33:663-667.
[2]
Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Leibold RA, Yamaguchi K. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:708-716.
[3]
Smith TO, Daniell H, Geere J-A, Toms AP, Hing CB. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the detection of partial-and full-thickness rotator cuff tears in adults. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30:336-346.
[4]
Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Takwoingi Y, Johnston RV, Hanchard NC, Faloppa F. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 9:CD009020.
[5]
de Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Nazarian LN. Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1701-1707.
[6]
Iannotti JP, Ciccone J, Buss DD, et al. Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1305-1311.
[7]
Moosmayer S, Smith H-J, Tariq R, Larmo A. Prevalence and characteristics of asymptomatic tears of the rotator cuff AN ULTRASONOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL STUDY. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:196-200.
[8]
Pujol N, Hargunani R, Gadikoppula S, Holloway B, Ahrens P.M. Dynamic ultrasound assessment in the diagnosis of intra-articular entrapment of the biceps tendon (hourglass biceps): A preliminary investigation. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2009;3:80-84.
[9]
Schibany N, Zehetgruber H, Kainberger F, et al. Rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic individuals: a clinical and ultrasonographic screening study. Eur J Radiol. 2004;51:263-268.
[10]
Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. Shoulder sonography. State of the art. Radiologic clinics of North America. 1999;37:767-785.
[11]
Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:498-504.
[12]
Seltzer SE, Finberg HJ, Weissman BN. Arthrosonography--technique, sonographic anatomy, and pathology. Invest Radiol. 1980;15:19-28.
[13]
Crass JR, Craig EV, Bretzke C, Feinberg SB. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. Radiographics. 1985;5:941-953.
[14]
Middleton WD, Reinus WR, Totty WG, Melson CL, Murphy WA. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff and biceps tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:440-450.
[15]
Al-Shawi A, Badge R, Bunker T. The detection of full thickness rotator cuff tears using ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:889-892.
Browse journals by subject